.
Feedback

Eshoo Hails New Cancer Research Law

'Recalcitrant' cancers, such as pancreatic cancer that killed actor Patrick Swayze and Ambassador Richard Sklar, will receive more attention from the National Cancer Institute.

 

Flanked by the wife of the late actor and cancer victim Patrick Swayze Wednesday, Rep. Anna G. Eshoo celebrated the passage of a law that requires the federal government to fight harder against the most deadly cancers.

Eshoo, D-Palo Alto, co-sponsored the Recalcitrant Cancer Research Act, which was signed by President Barack Obama on Jan. 3.

The law directs the National Cancer Institute to focus on early detection and treatment of cancers with very low survival rates—including pancreatic cancer, which has the lowest survival rate of the five major cancers.

"A very dear friend of mine, Ambassador Richard Sklar, was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer," Eshoo said at a news conference at Stanford Hospital. "It really took a toll on us, and when I asked why I haven't heard from (victims) about this, he said, 'because they're all dead.'

Eshoo continued, "Pancreatic cancer is one of the recalcitrant cancers—one that is essentially a death sentence."

Julie Fleshman, president and CEO of the Manhattan Beach-based Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, applauded Eshoo's five-year effort and that of U.S. Representative Leonard Lance (R-NJ) and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI). “Today, we celebrate this important step, but we do so while honoring the memory of so many people whose lives were cut short by pancreatic cancer.”

The congresswoman said the law is meant to push such cancers to the front lines of research.

“My husband Patrick fought courageously against pancreatic cancer before passing away 22 months after his diagnosis,” said Lisa Niemi Swayze. “I know that Patrick would be proud, too, that he was a part of this fight, one that is going to change the outcome for so many future generations.”

According to Eshoo, pancreatic cancer has the lowest five-year survival rate of all the major cancers, at just 6 percent. Seventy-five percent of victims die within the first year of their diagnosis, she said.

“All cancer patients hope for cure, or at the very least, treatments to afford them longer quality filled time,” said Dr. George Fisher, Associate Professor of Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine, in a statement on U.S. Rep. Eshoo's news release about the new law. 

“When a cure is not available with standard treatments, they hope for  breakthroughs in research that may benefit them. This legislation will give our patients with the most difficult cancers a reason to hope for better outcomes by accelerating the science and focusing research efforts on those diseases with the greatest need for improvement.”

A one page fact sheet with information about pancreatic cancer can be found here.

 

—Copyright © 2013 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited.

Additional information came from U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo's office. 

 

Stay Patched in! Follow Healdsburg Patch on Twitter | Like Healdsburg Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the daily email with links to the latest news.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Healdsburg Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin J. McCann April 20, 2013 at 02:15 pm
Although I received your invitation notice in the morning I was unable to attend because of plannedRead More activities. However, I think it's a good idea for you to do and thanks for initiative. The Patch could be a good idea however, for me, in addition to local community events and activities the articles have to offer objectivity. If you have a political and/or ideological scant I would discontinue to be a reader and thus not a contributor or letter writer. I think open discussion is good and that conflict is good as it could be about positive change however, I have many too many activities to occupy my time. 1. My question to you is as the editor what is your vision for Patch and at this point what is your plan to accomplish that vision. Societies large and small are looking for people with vision and mission. I am not suggesting you write your vision because the readership will see it soon enough. 2.What is Patch really? 3. What is the criteria to inspire you to write an editorial? 4. What makes Patch different from the other online newspapers? Christian, I would suggest that you encourage discourse but set up a few basic ground rules. I prefer that all communication be courteous and civil but being comfortably edgy is OK. You should reserve to right to pull any vindictive commentary/communication. How about a section or column with interviews with people who are doing interesting things outside the realm of Healdsburg events. Good luck!
zoe moire April 19, 2013 at 06:26 pm
A. Did not know about your "event" B. This article is more about the one person that didRead More show up - good advertising.....? C. Agree, news comes in very late and an editor needs to be on TOP of what's going on in this town ... everything from school events to Garden Club happenings. D. Mike McGuire typically posts after an event / or during -= around Sonoma Co. with pictures ... this is not so bad because it is usually a specific group he is working with, however, I think he also does a good job of "...hope to see you there..." - I don't see that on the Patch any longer. E. When questions are asked like (paraphrase): "Wow, breezy out there. Anyone see any trees down?" It is rather like the Patch editor has not been outside looking about - why not comment on a few things and then ask the readers. F. Most of the questions have been boring... but, if reporting is done first, then people would likely be more inclined to even open an article and take a peek. My 6 cents. Z
Mr. Joe April 7, 2013 at 04:19 pm
I find this often with the people over at the Healdsburg patch. Yes, you are right Christian we haveRead More plenty of sandwich places but come on! its our job as locals to be supportive of new business in healdsburg. They're investing in our tiny closknit town. Togos might be a franchise but what about that place called partake? Just another wine tasting room. I don't see an article about them listing all the other random tasting rooms it's competing with. I don't worry The Healdsburg patch has such little following in town anyway, they should just stick to recycling old articles from the Press Democrat. Thank you Healdsburg Patch for wasting our time. Yours truly the healdsburg local
Marilyn's worst nightmare April 5, 2013 at 01:11 am
Marilyn, read the article again...the article clearly states the business is not needed. So please,Read More lighten up, reread the article and form a clear argument for why you are upset. This article was well researched and simply showed there is no need for yet another sandwich shop.
Marilyn April 5, 2013 at 01:03 am
Christian, you were RUDE. Is that the way to welcome a new business to Healdsburg? You tell us toRead More lighten up???