.
Feedback

Rep. Mike Thompson Calls Gun Background Checks "No-Brainer"

The regional Democratic congressman, and his Republican colleague Peter King, call for the immediate passage of legislation requiring a background check for every gun sale.

Last night's State of the Union address covered many topics, but the most emotional was Obama's call for public accountability on gun control.

In an article published this week on the political website Politico, Congressman Mike Thompson (D), who represents all or part of Contra Costa, Lake, Napa, Solano and Sonoma Counties, and Congressman Peter King (R-NY), expressed their joint advocacy of gun control legislation.

With permission, their entire article is published here.

Background checks a no-brainer

By: Rep. Mike Thompson and Rep. Peter King
February 12, 2013 09:57 PM EST

Imagine if it were the Transportation Security Administration’s policy to let four out of 10 people bypass security at the airport. And imagine if TSA let passengers choose whether they’d go through security. Federal law prohibits this because if it didn’t, criminals, terrorists and others who are intent to do harm would easily slip through the cracks and board any plane they wanted.

With guns, there is no such law. It is estimated that four out of 10 gun buyers do not go through a background check when purchasing a firearm because federal law requires these checks only when someone buys a gun from a federally licensed dealer. This allows felons, domestic abusers and individuals with a history of dangerous mental illness to easily bypass the criminal background check system by purchasing firearms at gun shows, through private sellers, over the Internet or out of the trunks of cars.

Ninety-one percent of Americans, 88 percent of gun owners and 86 percent of National Rifle Association members believe this needs to change. They are correct.

Congress should immediately pass legislation requiring a background check for every gun sale, while respecting reasonable exceptions for cases such as gifts between immediate family members and temporary transfers for sporting purposes.

When background checks are used, they keep guns out of the hands of people we all agree shouldn’t have guns.

According to the FBI, completing the necessary paperwork for a background check takes mere minutes, and more than 91 percent of these electronic checks are completed instantaneously.

Since 1999, the federal background check system has blocked more than 1.7 million permit applications and gun sales to prohibited purchasers at federally licensed dealers. In 2010 alone, the system identified and denied more than 150,000 sales to criminals, domestic abusers, those with serious mental illnesses and other prohibited purchasers.

But the system works only if everyone is required to use it. We have no way of knowing whether in 2010 those same 150,000-plus prohibited purchasers bought a gun from a private seller or at a gun show after being denied at a federally licensed dealer.

It’s going to take a comprehensive approach that goes beyond universal background checks to meaningfully reduce and prevent gun violence.

We need to crack down on gun trafficking. In 2011, of the nearly 5,000 guns that were found at crime scenes in the state of New York and traced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, more than 3,300 were trafficked in from other states.

We need to improve mental health services. The gap between when a person starts to show signs of mental illness and when that person gets help can be up to a decade. That gap needs to be closed.

We need to prosecute prohibited buyers who attempt to buy guns. We also need to prosecute those who buy guns with the intent of giving the gun to someone who is prevented from owning one.

We need to get assault magazines off the street. These magazines carry more than 10 rounds and allow shooters to cause mass damage in a short amount of time.

But as we develop these comprehensive policy proposals and work to get them signed into law, we should do now what an overwhelming majority of Americans on all sides of the political spectrum agree on — make sure everyone who buys a gun goes through a background check.

Universal background checks are the easiest and most effective way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, domestic abusers and the mentally ill. They do nothing to prevent law-abiding Americans from exercising their Second Amendment right to own firearms. And they make our schools, streets and communities safer. Legislation requiring them is a no-brainer.

Rep. Mike Thompson is a Democrat from California; Rep. Peter King is a Republican from New York.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Healdsburg Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin J. McCann April 20, 2013 at 02:15 pm
Although I received your invitation notice in the morning I was unable to attend because of plannedRead More activities. However, I think it's a good idea for you to do and thanks for initiative. The Patch could be a good idea however, for me, in addition to local community events and activities the articles have to offer objectivity. If you have a political and/or ideological scant I would discontinue to be a reader and thus not a contributor or letter writer. I think open discussion is good and that conflict is good as it could be about positive change however, I have many too many activities to occupy my time. 1. My question to you is as the editor what is your vision for Patch and at this point what is your plan to accomplish that vision. Societies large and small are looking for people with vision and mission. I am not suggesting you write your vision because the readership will see it soon enough. 2.What is Patch really? 3. What is the criteria to inspire you to write an editorial? 4. What makes Patch different from the other online newspapers? Christian, I would suggest that you encourage discourse but set up a few basic ground rules. I prefer that all communication be courteous and civil but being comfortably edgy is OK. You should reserve to right to pull any vindictive commentary/communication. How about a section or column with interviews with people who are doing interesting things outside the realm of Healdsburg events. Good luck!
zoe moire April 19, 2013 at 06:26 pm
A. Did not know about your "event" B. This article is more about the one person that didRead More show up - good advertising.....? C. Agree, news comes in very late and an editor needs to be on TOP of what's going on in this town ... everything from school events to Garden Club happenings. D. Mike McGuire typically posts after an event / or during -= around Sonoma Co. with pictures ... this is not so bad because it is usually a specific group he is working with, however, I think he also does a good job of "...hope to see you there..." - I don't see that on the Patch any longer. E. When questions are asked like (paraphrase): "Wow, breezy out there. Anyone see any trees down?" It is rather like the Patch editor has not been outside looking about - why not comment on a few things and then ask the readers. F. Most of the questions have been boring... but, if reporting is done first, then people would likely be more inclined to even open an article and take a peek. My 6 cents. Z
Mr. Joe April 7, 2013 at 04:19 pm
I find this often with the people over at the Healdsburg patch. Yes, you are right Christian we haveRead More plenty of sandwich places but come on! its our job as locals to be supportive of new business in healdsburg. They're investing in our tiny closknit town. Togos might be a franchise but what about that place called partake? Just another wine tasting room. I don't see an article about them listing all the other random tasting rooms it's competing with. I don't worry The Healdsburg patch has such little following in town anyway, they should just stick to recycling old articles from the Press Democrat. Thank you Healdsburg Patch for wasting our time. Yours truly the healdsburg local
Marilyn's worst nightmare April 5, 2013 at 01:11 am
Marilyn, read the article again...the article clearly states the business is not needed. So please,Read More lighten up, reread the article and form a clear argument for why you are upset. This article was well researched and simply showed there is no need for yet another sandwich shop.
Marilyn April 5, 2013 at 01:03 am
Christian, you were RUDE. Is that the way to welcome a new business to Healdsburg? You tell us toRead More lighten up???
Nick April 9, 2013 at 11:52 am
Hmmm... Neil Cronin could move John and Zekes there!
Christian Kallen March 27, 2013 at 01:39 am
LOL!
zoe moire March 26, 2013 at 08:34 pm
Post office
Joanne March 20, 2013 at 09:32 pm
I spent 26 years living in San Luis Obispo, considered by many to be "the happiest place onRead More earth," however, since moving to Healdsburg in 2000, wild horses couldn't drag me back!!
ALIZA March 20, 2013 at 08:54 pm
Always knew that Healdsburg is the best ... wish I was still there.
J Winery March 20, 2013 at 03:53 pm
We are proud and honored that Healdsburg is the Number 1 "Best Small Town in America"!Read More Nestled in beautiful wine country, Healdsburg offers charm and adventure with an array of delicious local restaurants, stylish and hip wineries, and attractions from bike riding to kayaking for all. We view Healdsburg to be a #1 place to live and work, and a #1 destination to visit, now we can thank Fodor's Travel for making it official. Cheers, to all who have a passion for our chic and charming town of Healdsburg!